The Role of Socio-Economic Factors in Shaping Neural Development and Learning Abilities of Students

This study synthesises current evidence on how socio-economic status (SES) influences neural development and learning in children and adolescents. Using a content analysis approach, we reviewed peer-reviewed studies across developmental neuroscience, psychology, and education to map pathways linking SES with brain structure and function, executive processes, and academic achievement. Throughout the corpus, low SES is consistently linked to altered maturation in cortico-limbic and frontoparietal networks, reduced volumes related to language and memory, and weaker functional segregation; these differences often coincide with diminished executive function, lower working memory, and poorer academic performance. Mechanisms include early-life nutrition and health, cumulative stress, cognitive stimulation at home and school, and neighbourhood resources. The evidence also highlights protective factors—such as scaffolding and enriched learning environments, strong teacher–student relationships, parental support, preschool attendance, and nutrition literacy—that mediate or moderate risk. Theoretically, the findings align with Maslow’s hierarchy (unmet deficiency needs, limiting growth needs) and Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory (development through guided participation within the zone of proximal development). Notably, some students show academic resilience: higher cognitive ability and robust executive skills buffer the effects of socioeconomic disadvantages. The synthesis indicates that SES impacts learning through interconnected biological, mental, and environmental pathways rather than a single causal route. We conclude that multi-level interventions integrating early nutrition and health support, executive-function training, cognitively rich instruction, and community investments are most promising for reducing SES-related disparities. Future research should include longitudinal, culturally diverse cohorts to clarify sensitive periods and optimise cost-effective, equity-focused policies and practices. The review also emphasises ethical and policy implications for equitable education.