Clinical Outcomes of Robotic vs Conventional CABG and Alternative Revascularization in CAD Patients: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence

MD, Usha Topalkatti, and Devanaboyina, Krushika and Kumar, Rajanikant and Woldehana, Nathnael Abera and Kolanu, Nikhil Deep and Catic, Sumeja and Sivakumaar, Thirumurugan and Baji, Dheeraj and Sree Reddy, Narla Sai Jahnu and Ahamed, Ismail and Lavanya, Kanchi and Aravazhi, Thirumeni and Gudla, Sushmith and Vasireddy, Hemanth and Sharma, Vipin Narayan and Shazley, Ameer M and Khezhie, Petelaviu (2025) Clinical Outcomes of Robotic vs Conventional CABG and Alternative Revascularization in CAD Patients: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 10 (4): 25apr1455. pp. 4154-4156. ISSN 2456-2165

[A][B][+][-]

Abstract

Robot-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting (RA-CABG) has gained recognition as a less invasive substitute for traditional CABG, offering potential benefits in patient recovery and lower complication rates. This systematic review examines the safety, effectiveness, and postoperative results of RA-CABG in comparison to standard CABG and alternative revascularization methods.

Documents